SUMMARY The applicant in this matter, “NK”, applied to the court in terms of rule 33(4) of the Uniform Rules of the High Court (“the Rules”) for a separation of issues in the divorce proceedings between him and his wife, “KM”. The parties sought an order to have their marriage dissolved. KM opposed the claim
SUMMARY The applicants brought an urgent application seeking urgent interdictory relief, pending the determination of Part B, which included final interdictory relief, declaratory orders, declarations of delinquency and an order removing the first and second respondent as directors of Prepaid 24 (Pty) Ltd. In March 2016, the applicants, in the name of Handmade Connections, entered
SUMMARY This case dealt with a final interdict whereby the Applicants sought the following relief: 1.  that any agreement between the First Respondent and the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Respondents for the production of the late Brenda Fassie movie be declared null and void; 2. that the termination notice, dated 14 December 2017, which
SUMMARY The First Applicant (“MLN”), South African Citizen and member of South African National Defence Force, and the Second Applicant (“DMN”), a citizen of the Democratic Republic of Congo (“DRC”) (collectively referred to as “the Parties”), met whilst DMN was posted in the DRC as a peacekeeper. The Parties married in DRC, their marriage, however,
SUMMARY The applicants instituted a claim for arrear wages in terms of section 77(3) of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act. The application was based on a judgment from the Labour Court, that the applicants be reinstated, retrospectively to the date of their unfair dismissals, and that the applicants report for duty within 14 days
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Bothongo Agriculture GP (Pty) Ltd (the “Applicant”) owns the Rhino and Lion Reserve, a plot of land adjacent to the property in respect of which the application was launched (the “Property”). The Applicant sought to acquire the Property from the first respondent, Kerbyland (Pty) Ltd (the “First Respondent”), which Property was being
SUMMARY The Applicant in this matter, as the nominated executrix of her deceased husband’s estate, sought an order of ejectment, by the High Court of the Eastern Cape Local Division, against the First Respondent in respect of premises previously owned by the deceased. The First Respondent is the deceased’s nephew and heir of the only
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Mr. Alister James Forsyth (the “Applicant”) made an application to the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town (the “Court”), for the consolidation of two actions instituted by the Applicant against different defendants in terms of Rule 11 of the Uniform Rules of Court. The Applicant, who is the
SUMMARY The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming R1,100,000.00 for alleged professional negligence by various hospitals’ doctors and nurses that treated the plaintiff. The defendant raised an exception, and the plaintiff amended her pleadings. The defendant raised a second exception on the basis that the plaintiff’s amended particulars failed to rectify the complaint, are
SUMMARY This appeal concerned the consolidated appeals against two eviction applications. The Respondent, Magic Vending (Pty) Ltd applied for the eviction of the Appellants from their respective units. The court a quo granted the eviction of the Appellants, on the ground that they had failed to make payment of rental amounts to the Respondent. On