Case summary written by Phathu Ratshitanga and checked by Kirsten Chetty Background This case concerns an alleged unlawful nuisance in the form of an offensive odour. The matter was initially heard before a single judge in the Western Cape Division of the High Court of South Africa (“the Court a quo”) and was later taken
By Phathu Ratshitanga and checked by Lauren Squier        Background In this matter, judge Perram of the Federal Court of Australia dealt with an application for postponement of a trial which was set down for a period of six weeks, commencing 16 June 2020. The trial, a class action in relation to faulty
By Phathu Ratshitanga and checked by Wesley Pons    Background This is an appeal in which the Supreme Court of Appeal (the “SCA”) upheld the findings of the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria (the “Trial Court”) where Twala AJ sat as the court of first instance. The issue before the trial court was
By Lauren Squier, Associate and Phathutshedzo Ratshitanga, CandidateAttorney Introduction The allocation of parking is one of the most contentious and sensitive topics in sectional title schemes and trustees often have to ensure that they apply only lawful methods in allocating parking in order to avoid members challenging the legality of same.  This article explains how
By Lauren Squier, Associate and Phathutshedzo Ratshitanga, Candidate Attorney Introduction We are now well into the national lockdown in the fight against COVID-19. A recurring question within this period has been whether employers can expect their employees to leave the safety of their homes and keep working for them and the possible consequences that can
SUMMARY This is an application for rescission of judgment wherein Interactive Trading 115 CC (the “First Applicant”) and Barend Stephanus Schempers (the “Second Applicant”) (the “Applicants”) sought to rescind a judgment which was granted in default against them on 21 December 2017 and later varied on 05 June 2018. Both the main judgment and the
SUMMARY This is an application for rescission of judgment wherein Interactive Trading 115 CC (the “First Applicant”) and Barend Stephanus Schempers (the “Second Applicant”) (the “Applicants”) sought to rescind a judgment which was granted in default against them on 21 December 2017 and later varied on 05 June 2018. Both the main judgment and the
SUMMARY This was an interlocutory application made in terms of rule 30A(1) of the Uniform Rules of Superior Court Practice (“the uniform rules of court”) wherein the Minister of Safety and Security (“the Applicant”) sought an order striking out an answering affidavit deposed to by Mzukisi Tyali (“the First Respondent”). The main application was made
SUMMARY Mr Tankiso Moeketsi (the “accused”), in this criminal trial faced a charge of murder in that on or about 04 November 2017, and at or near the district of Ehkuruleni Central, he unlawfully and intentionally killed his brother (the “deceased”), by stabbing him with knives and hitting him with a spade. The accused and